<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/MU" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Reasons why Microsoft Exchange Hosting is better than Google Apps</title>
	<link>http://blogs.msexchange.org/exchangehosting/2007/07/10/five-reasons-why-microsoft-exchange-hosting-is-better-than-google-apps/</link>
	<description>The Exchange Hosting blog authored by Exchange MVP Shaji Firoz will focus on news, services, partners, and other thoughts about what is happening in the Exchange Hosting industry. The blog will discuss how to better outsource an Exchange messaging infrastructure to a Hosted environment and the latest information about the Hosted Exchange industry will be covered in detail through press releases from leading Exchange Hosting vendors.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  4 Dec 2008 17:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.msexchange.org/exchangehosting/2007/07/10/five-reasons-why-microsoft-exchange-hosting-is-better-than-google-apps/#comment-3670</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.msexchange.org/exchangehosting/2007/07/10/five-reasons-why-microsoft-exchange-hosting-is-better-than-google-apps/#comment-3670</guid>
					<description>Reason #1 doesn't make a whole lot of sense.  You're basically saying that any random company with a Microsoft license is more trustworthy than Google.  I would venture to say that most people trust Google more highly than Microsoft, let alone a &quot;Microsoft-licensed&quot; company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reason #1 doesn&#8217;t make a whole lot of sense.  You&#8217;re basically saying that any random company with a Microsoft license is more trustworthy than Google.  I would venture to say that most people trust Google more highly than Microsoft, let alone a &#8220;Microsoft-licensed&#8221; company.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.msexchange.org/exchangehosting/2007/07/10/five-reasons-why-microsoft-exchange-hosting-is-better-than-google-apps/#comment-105</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.msexchange.org/exchangehosting/2007/07/10/five-reasons-why-microsoft-exchange-hosting-is-better-than-google-apps/#comment-105</guid>
					<description>Most of this article compares fully hosted Microsoft Exchange solutions to the standard (i.e. free) version of Google Apps.  In order for the comparison to valid, the blog should compare either the free versions of Microsoft Exchange hosting solutions to the free version of Google Apps or the the paid versions of Microsoft Exchange hosting to the paid (i.e. premium) version of Google Apps.  Basically, what this blog says is that the free version of Google Apps doesn't provide 99.9% uptime and 24/7 support phone support. The premium service does provide those features.  

It does comment on some feature related issues such as not being able to use Gmail in an offline mode, not having a Google apps appliance and integration with wireless features.  These are real issues and should be a part of a trade-off analysis.  I personally use both MS Exchange based e-mail with an Outlook client and Gmail-based e-mail with a Mozilla Thunderbird client.  Both have their advantages and disadvantages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of this article compares fully hosted Microsoft Exchange solutions to the standard (i.e. free) version of Google Apps.  In order for the comparison to valid, the blog should compare either the free versions of Microsoft Exchange hosting solutions to the free version of Google Apps or the the paid versions of Microsoft Exchange hosting to the paid (i.e. premium) version of Google Apps.  Basically, what this blog says is that the free version of Google Apps doesn&#8217;t provide 99.9% uptime and 24/7 support phone support. The premium service does provide those features.  </p>
<p>It does comment on some feature related issues such as not being able to use Gmail in an offline mode, not having a Google apps appliance and integration with wireless features.  These are real issues and should be a part of a trade-off analysis.  I personally use both MS Exchange based e-mail with an Outlook client and Gmail-based e-mail with a Mozilla Thunderbird client.  Both have their advantages and disadvantages.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Weekend reading - subject: exchange</title>
		<link>http://blogs.msexchange.org/exchangehosting/2007/07/10/five-reasons-why-microsoft-exchange-hosting-is-better-than-google-apps/#comment-95</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.msexchange.org/exchangehosting/2007/07/10/five-reasons-why-microsoft-exchange-hosting-is-better-than-google-apps/#comment-95</guid>
					<description>[...] Five Reasons why Microsoft Exchange Hosting is better than Google Apps [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Five Reasons why Microsoft Exchange Hosting is better than Google Apps [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
